Prior to the meeting, I confirmed with Jimmie Harden that there would be time for questions following the agenda. He asked if there was something I wanted to discuss prior to the meeting and I declined, referring to PUSH concerns about mayor's commission on the 10 year plan and coordination with ESHC's 10 year Plan.
About 30 people attended, comprised of members from the continuum of care, employees of ESHC and residents of ESHC's transitional housing.
George Gardner opened the meeting with prayer.
Jimmie Harden gave the treasurer's report by referring to a packet available. He noted land being cleared Monday in anticipation of the building of the 4 transitional houses on Smith Street on the Chapin campus. He stated the financial records were being readied for the CPA whose report should be done by April 3.
Minutes: The minutes from the last meeting were not available. Since the last meeting involved the point in time training conducted mere days before the actual count, he determined to just file these for the record without approval.
Wildflower Clinic update: Laurel, ESHC program coordinator/Executive Director, gave the new hours for the clinic in West Augustine. She noted the director had the flu and would be available at the next meeting.
Point in time count and survey (Jan 27, 2009): Laurel stated a preliminary count of 1370 homeless, a 10% increase over 2007. About 200 surveys were sent for analysis to UNF with results expected within a month.
HMIS: Homeless Management Information System: Laurel noted the stimulus funding will require agencies accepting funding to use this system. Training on the system will be conducted 2/26 from 10-noon and 1- 3PM at the main ESHC office at 523 West King Street. A final training will be 2/29 at 10 AM regarding 2009 issues.
Tom Crawford, SJC Housing Authority was the main speaker today. He has a great grasp of the funding streams currently in process, noting a 50k allocation to the Wildflower Clinic. He indicated the time frames are tight to acquire upcoming funding and use it. The plan is to implement the Housing Finance Authority to purchase foreclosed properties with 25% allocated to home ownership and the rest to non profits for low income rental management. He anticipates 3 funding cycles and hopes to start acquiring by late spring. MaryLea asked if community land trusts are eligible under these programs but Tom said they aren't encouraged to do that under federal provisions. George questioned ratio of high end to low end properties. Tom outlined how properties will be selected by census tracks and realty reports to get areas hit hardest by foreclosures, then house price. Tom explained the money is
allocated by need and larger counties and municipalities will get more than SJC based on the rating scale. He expects 20 to 25 units in the first go around. Neighborhood Stabilization Programs will be the vehicle and properties will not exceed 85% of appraised value. Non profits applying will need to prove 5 years experience managing low income rental properties but cost to non profits is nil. His plan is to get these properties under consideration quickly, get them out and approved quickly and get in line for future funding. HFA will ID qualified non profits. The properties going for sale for qualified first time buyers (non homeowners for at least 3 years) will be handled by HFA. Tom mentioned coordination with Habitat for Humanity for rehab assistance. Shelters will not qualify. Transitional housing must show at least one year residency; Betty Griffin would qualify for example.
Currently plans are to use non profits for rental properties only. MaryLea asked about specific housing for former offenders and did churches qualify? Tom restated any non profit must show history of 5 years of low income rental property management to qualify. Although the application process for the funding is very time limited, once funding is received, the agency has 4 years to complete the project.
Jean Harden noted criteria for HUD funding: numbers of unemployed, numbers of food stamp recipients and number of evictions. SJC is a non formula county; our funding comes through the state. She stated SJC will have to wait to see how much money we will receive for homelessness prevention. Currently the Salvation Army uses its funding for rent and utility assistance. SJC contract manager Gary Schwab estimates 500k for our county; Jean feels we are on the low end of the spectrum and may not be competitive enough to acquire the full amount. Of course, an accurate point in time count would have been helpful in this pursuit but more on that later.
A number of listed fundraisers were mentioned.
St Francis House: Renee Morris deferred to Holly Yelton to discuss the mayor's commission on ending homelessness through a 10 year plan. Speaking extemporaneously, Holly did a good job outlining the mayor's alignment with current federal USICH (US Interagency Council on Homelessness) which has a template many cities in the nation have adopted to end homelessness. She updated the group on the mayor's last meeting, indicating sub committees were being formed to address different aspects such as fundraising and church/agency outreach. She noted 24k raised to pay a United Way employee to conduct a needs assessment. This seemed to cause some confusion among members present who I assume thought the ESHC had this information.
The meeting was coming to a close when Jimmie called on me on behalf of PUSH. I disclosed the following:
USICH formed in 2002, Florida held statewide workshop 2003. ESHC presented their 10 yr plan to city/county commissions in 2006, ESHC delivered our SJC 10 year plan to PUSH in May 2007 after numerous requests. That document, dated May 2007 is currently on our website as the SJC 10 year plan.
PUSH discovered last week the SJC 10 year plan is not even on the HUD approved list although Broward City, Alachua, Hillsborough, Miami-Dade, Miami, Seminole, Jacksonville, Tampa, Pinellas, Key West and Tallahassee are all listed as having viable 10 year plans.
My question and concern involved the mayor's group reinventing the wheel. I stated the 09 point in time count was seriously flawed with no indication any camps were fully counted. Jimmie got defensive and began to shut the meeting down. Holly wanted to confirm the 1370 count as accurate as she will need valid information to move forward on a viable plan. I asked what the ESHC had been doing for the last 3 years. Jean indicated there was no money to pursue enactment of their "plan".
In the interest of time and the current issue being discussed I did not feel it prudent to address the following but am providing it here for PUSH members' information:
1. The point in time survey was flawed and incomplete. Some agencies refused to survey their own clients and volunteers (some from PUSH) performed this function instead of going out into camps and other areas. This was denied by ESHC. I did state you cannot count the same people you count at 445 AM at labor pools again at 500 PM by serving pots of chili.
2. PUSH member witnessed three private donors questioning the location of a flat screen TV donated to a specific family in the transitional housing campus. They were told variously that the items often go "into storage" for future use to "often donated items are sold for drugs". The worry now is the distribution of donations, particularly now in light of the Bike Collective donating bikes to residents on that campus.
3. Why is the ESHC currently on its 6th program coordinator in the past 3 years?
4. Why was a one year volunteer "fired" after calling the state with concerns about waste and abuse?
I was going to ask the board of directors if they felt they had acted efficiently and effectively over their 10 year existence. I was then going to propose the ESHC current board of directors be dissolved and reformed under county supervision but never got to go there.
Interestingly, after the meeting, several residents came up to us with numerous reports of code violations in the transitional housing which are not being addressed. Last year, after the whistleblowing effort by PUSH, the state stepped in and conducted unannounced and announced inspections to ensure the 71k they were allocated last year for repairs were done. (they were) PUSH will re contact the state contract manager with these reports and a request for re inspection of some of these properties.
Clearly PUSH is acting as the watchdog over this lead agency to make sure what little money is still available is used as contracted as well as private donations being used for the purpose for which they were given. Help us anyway you can to keep the mayor's commission work and the ESHC funding in the sunshine. Email any information to admin@push.org
--Mary Lawrence